|
The server logs do tell us what browsers people are using, and from that we can determine roughly how many people are accessing the site from mobile devices - we don't need to take up people's time sending out a survey.
There will be some surveys sent out to people, but there are various other pre-requisites first - such as verifying member's email addresses and determining which language they want to receive that sort of information in, which is something that's underway at the moment.
For the last few months (I don't have figures from before we moved to the current server), log analysis shows no mobile browsers in the top 15, the lowest of which accounts for marginally over 1% of the hits to the site (compared to about 25% for IE 8 ). So, I don't consider it very likely that the number of people accessing the site from mobiles will be a large proportion of users at all; given our geographic distribution of members, the majority of people will have desktop access to the net too.
So, I will not be ensuring mobile compatibility at the expense of providing better features for the majority, when we redesign the site. I won't be going out of my way to break the experience for mobile users, but nor am I going to compromise the whole site just for the sake of a few people on the bus playing with their iPhones. It's more likely that the site will be designed so that there can be a specific mobile version produced easily, with limited functionality, as in the case of GF2go.
Even if we look just at event images, there are presently around 5,000 of those, plus thumbnails of each one. Unless we decide to orphan old magazine galleries (which I'm not keen on), then we will have to find a way to bring those into any new design too. That, again, tends to point towards something that can be done on the fly, server-side, or can at least be very easily automated to process the pictures and create galleries in a new format.
|